Foot Down- Stop the Feud!

Children should be seen, not heard- I think I like this quote/reference.

Many know by now that there is a war going on by two different groups, recently one of our teammates was messaged on Facebook with a link to the lestrollops blog. Sorry to say, trying to get us involved with this feud or trying to make us see reason to take sides will not help your cause, or goal which ever that might be.

This is about a dog’s life yet you are turning it into something much more. Point Blank the dog “Lennox” was put to death for the wrong reasons. And yet you all continue to bicker amongst each other.

Let it be known I am not taking any sides, not yet, unless both parties can legitimately prove that they are right or the other is wrong. You both have done none of that so far.

What I do not appreciate is taking something that Deed Not Breed Uk has stated and turned it into something it wasn't meant for. (Lestrollops) 

Where is the proof that these people have threatened you, with anything, Lestrollops?

Where is the proof that Mel Page has all these aliases? You are taking snap shots of random names and putting it together stating it is Mel Page. Sorry to say, it proves nothing and anyone with a brain can see you are doing this to destroy someone’s reputation over a disagreement you had during a meeting/conference/court.

I am an outsider looking in, I am looking at both blogs and the most I get from them is a bunch of women/men, mud slinging insults at one another. Quite frankly, grow up.

I do believe I am not the only who feels like they're caught back in high school drama. I do not care who is right or wrong in this situation, when both parties are wrong, for attacking each other online, instead of talking it out like ADULTS.

Also taking screenshots of Mel’s Page Facebook account having a conversation with friends about stupid things proves what? Nothing and the comments on your lestrollops blog belong to those who are in your little hate/attacker group. 

Lennox Case affiliates who are possibly writing the Lestrollops blog, is Winters and several others. Of course they would start hating on those who found out the truth of what happened... Which I will leave for those who are not in the feud to disclose to the public when they are ready.

Not my place, since the only thing I truly know about Lennox, is he was taken, put in the pound and then put to death. I truly do not care for back story or who's right or wrong, The only thing I truly care about is the fact that a life was lost due to DDA and BSL.

Truthfully the more I read Lestrollops blog the more I feel reason to side with LLAAV. Since this has been happening for about 18 months straight now, and it seems as though Lestrollops doesn't care about anything but sullying names, or taking screenshots of conversations between friends.

This is one of the screenshots I am talking about, They took what DNB uk stated and twisted it into something else.

Sigh, taken a screenshot and underlining words to make it mean something else helps your case how? I see no underlining meaning here. Mel made a statement that is true and to the point. People/Owners should have a choice at which organization to use, and it shouldn't matter how many number of cases, but the the amount of care these animals receive.

I sense some jealousy with the lestrollops blog... Far as I can Tell Mel, isn't obsessed with numbers not even in her "Heather Jones" Days. Did we mention Mel is Mel, and Heather is Heather.

Yet as I stated above, they take screenshots of different accounts and try to make you believe that all those accounts are of the same Person. Trust me, they are not the same person, they are all individuals.

Don't take my word for how vile Lestrollops are being just visit their blog and you will see the insanity. Lestrollops.wordpress.com

Meanwhile LLAAV, is stuck defending themselves from such insanity... And this is where I put my foot down.

Both sides have made this into a dispute, a long out battle.

Both Sides are at fault here for continuing the bickering.
Both Sides, need to hash this out like adults not like high school teenage girls.

There is too much drama in the world for this to continue, the deed was done, Lennox is lost to us... And you know what.... BOTH PARTIES are TARNISHING his MEMORY and what he STOOD FOR. 

And truthfully Lestrollops this dispute should have been kept between you, Mel and possibly ted, heather and pallack.

Not Karin or the others you have listed on your "troll list". I know Karin personally and she is far from a troll, she is a lovely woman who cares deeply for all these animals that need homes, or whom have been deemed dangerous unfairly. She is also my Teammate and a great asset to my research team, Maybe if you got to know her, you would have seen that, but no, Lestrollops decided to stalk, and harass her for asking a simple question on a page.

So asking where the information came from apparently makes people a troll, lestrollops? I would have asked the same question if I had seen this page. Some things are hard to believe, without the proof to back it up.

Lestrollops, LLAAV.. My statement to both of you.

First to Lestrollops:

Stop stalking, harassing, slandering and defaming, DNB UK and EGAR, you are not helping the animals involved, what you are doing is making it impossible for these dogs to find homes. What don't you understand? EGAR from what I understand it is practically the only bully breed rescue Ireland has right now.. Why would you damage this for them? Why would you say such trash about them? Them whom have been working hard to get these dogs into proper homes and out of danger from being Euthanized...

If you truly care for any animals life you would stop these asinine attacks on these groups.

DNB UK helps owners with the DDA am I correct? Helps them handle the court cases etc, now if you continue to attack DNB Uk, where are these owners supposed to turn to then when they need help with these court cases, or help handling the pressure that the DDA has been dishing out. This not only affects the owners, but the dogs lives in this case.

So please forgive me if I think you need to give these unwarranted attacks a rest for awhile, because I truly see no need for them since this is all based on a disagreement.
If you want to help these animals, then do so, but not if it costs the lives of others..

LLAAV-
I know you have been through a tremendous amount of stress piled on from Lestrollops... Yet feeding into the hype, and trash talk doesn't make this look anymore good on you either.

Ignore, block, ban that's all you can do, that's all any of us can do with people who chose to show hate instead of help or constructive comments. Truly I know where I stand and I must say even though I agree with some of what you have stated....

The dispute, is unwarranted, it's unprofessional, it looks childish. And most of all it takes focus off the issue at hand, which is FIGHTING against the BSL.

Remember this next time you all start poking at each others throats.. Use your hate for each other to focus on advocating against the BSL and DDA laws. And not this he said, or she said arguments.

It's pointless, it's tiresome, and a majority of other advocates are getting sick and tired of being dragged into this bullarchy, when they have said nothing or have done nothing for them to be dragged into it. Keep this battle between yourselves and in private. No one cares for this drama, no one cares for the he said she said scenario when there isn't any evidence to back the statements made.

Good Luck to the both of you, May the better person walk away from this and learn to IGNORE the attention seeking ways of hateful people.

It Just Doesn't Stop - Pit Haters Are illogical

My friend shares a petition on a page for the defense of Pit bulls, and this woman Marie casually comments like it doesn't mean anything. Marie, If you must know the only feelings hurt were yours and DBO's founder. Then again we all know truth hurts doesn't it?

Where is she getting this information? You cannot tell a pitbull based on looks, a DNA test is required, or did you miss that memo? Furthermore you didn't answer our friends question about DBO...

So, I'll ask. If DBO supports human life, why does she stalk and attack people, along with affiliating herself with a known child killer and people like you?

Fair question, would love to see it answered. Pit's do not have a high prey drive sweety, unless you consider their origins of HERDING high prey drive, then again they don't kill live stock unless TRAINED wrong.

I believe we covered this before unpredictability are caused by the dog fighters who train and breed their dogs to be aggressive... It is the dog fighters fault that we have this problem. Do some research Marie.

15 out of 16? That's a bit off, fact is there were no PIT BULLS in the news, but then again since the Bull Mastiffs and cane corso's along with other breeds are under this label, it would be accurate. However, they are not pit bulls, APBTS weren't in the news this year unless it was a dog fighting raid bust that had rescued APBTS. Would you like to continue as my friend asked...

I surely didn't see you say they weren't bred for fighting, I saw you clearly state that Dogfighters - Pit fighters do this. Which is fact, yet you are correct Marie is missing the key points that you have stated.

This is what advocates deal with on a daily basis from these haters. The illogical spurting of falsified statements.

Marie I do believe you have a nickname don't you, Something along the lines of Mad-dog? I wonder why that is.

Like my friend stated, keep repeating you are doing a great impersonation of a PARROT. 

Last Statement To SDS

This will be our final statement to SDS, Evie. We are done with you, you are a mere child compared to others who make it a habit to destroy the breeds out there. Your nonsense is just that, nonsense.

Case in point:

Really? I question this, due to the fact that there are always, ALWAYS petitions, always LAWYERS, and always ADVOCACY GROUPS. These dogs are not immediately euthanized at the owners request, 10 day quarantine if it is not a pit bull type dog, evaluated for temperament, court dates, petitions start, lawyers looked for, and advocacy groups form. And apologies are always made, unless that person was the reason for the attack to happen. Are you this daft?

Proof that there are lawyers for dogs:

What does that say ^ Eve? Defense for "Dogs", they have now started taking cases for ALL breeds of dogs. Your statement is flawed Eve.

REBEKA BREDER - is an animal lawyer for this firm, she has worked on a few cases in the BC AREA that were non- pit bull related.

http://www.boughtonlaw.com/people/lawyers/rebeka-breder/

Again Evie SDS, SUMMERS EVE. Statement FLAWED.

Another point:

CAPS is an advocate activist group dedicated in protecting companions from abuse, they even go to shelters and investigate. Again your statement is flawed.

About:CAPS website
*************
www.caps-web.org

CAPS' Beginnings
*****************
In 1989, when Deborah Howard, president of the Companion Animal Protection Society (CAPS) noticed the cramped, unsanitary conditions at a Docktor Pet Center, she was stunned. The company had more than 300 franchises at that time. Ms. Howard joined forces with Robert Baker, then the foremost puppy mill investigator in the country, and generated two "20/20" exposes and articles in People and Life. These exposes took on the pet shop industry - "20/20" and People named Docktor directly - and showed the horrors of puppy mills.

As a result of these efforts, Docktor Pet Centers, who refused to do business without the sale of puppies, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in February 1993.

Ms. Howard, a former radio news reporter, lawyer and PR professional, formed CAPS in 1990. The nonprofit became a 501(c)(3), in 1992.

CAPS' Mission
**************
Founded by President Deborah Howard in 1992, the Companion Animal Protection Society (CAPS) is the only national nonprofit organization dedicated exclusively to protecting companion animals from cruelty in pet shops and puppy mills. CAPS actively addresses the abuse and suffering of pet shop and puppy mill dogs through investigations, education, media relations, legislative involvement, puppy mill dog rescues, consumer assistance and pet industry employee relations.


Another point of proof:

Diesel, BC area allegedly bit a girl- Petitions were started, a advocacy group formed, lawyers obtained. Owner lost his dog, the dog was rehomed out of the BC area. REHOMED not put to death, then again we don't know because of the judges ruling, stating that Diesel's information be kept PRIVATE from anyone involved with the advocacy group, his ex owner, which included the lawyer. So again EVIE your statement is flawed.




Another case in point- Chum and Champ:

This case made headlines, Chum and Champ - NEWFOUNDLANDS not pit bulls by the way. Accused of attacking a Jack russell terrier by a spiteful woman. Petitions were made, and an advocacy group created, a lawyer obtained - REBEKA BREDER. Chum declared Dangerous while Champ was taken away from the Mansea family. Chum spent about 2 to 3 years in the SPCA pound. Until finally she was freed, only to pass away from complications of "Cancer".

Again Evie your statement is FLAWED.

The only reason "SOME" Victims are blamed because they provoked the dogs into attacking, or they made the dog feel threatened. 

Those who were attacked without provocation have been apologized too, and sympathy for them is always stated, along with which the owner is blamed for irresponsibility. If the owner puts the dog down because of what happened, instead of rehoming the dog into a better environment for training and socializing than that owner TRULY did not give a shit about their dog. Again Evie your statements are flawed.

This is our last Statement to you Evie- you have a lot of growing up to do, and a lot of education to learn. Get off the comp box and read some books, instead of biased pit hating blogs, such as Maultalk, Dogsbite, and Pitbull holocaust since those are your true reliable, reputable, credible resources -.-

Bullshit-  Dogsbite.org is not credible, reputable maybe, for her lies, and flawed statistics. reliable, far from it. And we have taken it up with them, D'uh did you not see all the blogs, forums and youtube videos out there? 

I don't pity you Evie, you deserve the crap you receive  that you have dealt to others. KARMA it happens.

Even now your followers are seeing the truth behind your surade.

You now have only 64 followers from? 228 that's a lot of people waking up Evie.
Soon you will only have that Pit Hating cult from the dogsbite.org following your stupidity, enjoy it because their your only fans/friends.

Yep, basically. But Evie, there is nothing libel here, especially when there is PROOF behind everything we have ever Stated.


 now be a good little girl and 



Good Bye Evie- SDS-Summers Eve- We wash our hands of you, pesty troll that you are, not even worth this news/blog space, however, we made an exception just these couple times, on request from our fellow advocates...

Love you guys over there at Nutty Quotes, continue the work you do. <3

DogsBite.ORG- Part 2- enough said for now

DogsBite.Org- Part 2

The followers, or should we say cult have been told to harass pro pit advocate pages. Lately they have been targeting a page that represents NZ, American Pit Bull Terrier Assn INC. Screen Shots down below to prove how unstable and illiterate these little cult trolls really are. These are some of the Usual Suspects, which are in affiliation with Colleen Lynn. APBT Inc and Our Team have had some long heated debates with them, defending once again our breeds that have been slandered.

That certainly is not the latest research, as you can all plainly see those articles are from 2011 and 2012. On top of the fact it isn’t even studies, it is medical records and notes that MD’s have taken over a course of a year, documenting dog bite incidents, does it say pit bulls? Yes, do we think they know for sure it was a Pit bull? No, because it has been proven that there are those who cannot distinguish a pit bull from a white boxer, or Dogo Argentino or even a bulldog or even a terrier.

http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/2011/04000/Mortality,_Mauling,_and_Maiming_by_Vicious_Dogs.23.aspx

This is the original Article, this is also were Colleen Lynn spends most of her time supposedly “researching”.

http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/early/2012/06/29/injuryprev-2012-040389.full?
Apparently Lynne was blind to one detail this article stated such as this:
“Past evaluations of different forms of regulations have led to conclusions that BSL is ineffective in reducing dog-bite injuries of varying severities”
Shocking to see those whom support BSL say that it is flawed, oh my!

Did Lynne also forget to mention the TEXAS STUDY was a flawed one and has been thrown out, case in point:

(Dr. Bonnie Beaver, a professor of veterinary medicine at Texas A&M University and an expert in dog behavior, described the study as flawed. Beaver, a former president of the American Veterinary Medicine Association, who led a national task force on preventing dog bites, has testified against breed-specific bans before state lawmakers.

“These are serious injuries to humans, and I do not mean to belittle the seriousness of the problem seen at the hospital,” Beaver said. “However, the dog-related data is seriously flawed, and are used at will to try to prove a specific point of view.”
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Pit-bulls-reputation-takes-new-hit-1370739.php)

Raghavan, is a BSL enthusiast of course Raghavan would partially lie about studies that have been discontinued or thrown away, due to the flawed aspect.

Did not read the studies, yet quotes Raghavan. Interesting to say the least, the simple copying and pasting of statements without one ounce of legitimate proof supplied. Who is to say that these people actually obtained it from Ragahavan and not Colleen?

Banning any breed of dog would not help the issue, people would just move on to the next desirable breed, so where would this leave us? Genocide, wiping out every single dog in existence this is what BSL would be capable of, yet these people fail to realize this. This is why we fight; this is what keeps us going, to fight against BSL to prevent this Genocide from happening.

This is our reality, and until these people wake up, our fight will continue.

Who said we were ignoring the studies? Peer-reviewed, please Lynne read what you have said. PEER-REVIEWED, this is saying that these studies are nothing more than NOTES. Notes tend to have misinformation, and propaganda behind it, since those who are viewing it have the same narrow mindedness as the ones who wrote it. We are open to discussion and opinions yet if it is repetitive, we tend to turn off our attention to you. AWA was and has been honest behind their reasoning you are just failing to see the points behind it.

As APBT pointed out, the Spanish study showed nothing of what Lynne Stated. You didn’t have access Lynne? I think it was more along the lines, of not wanting the truth being stated.

Joanna claims she follows the bible by heart, we would like to know which one she follows, because spewing out hate toward a creation of the lord sure the heck is being hypocritical to us, we have actually taken the time to read the bibles out there. We may not worship the same superior being, but we do not turn a blind eye to most of the lessons. Joanna is also a supporter of one of the trolling pages such as this one:

We suspect that she might even be a co-creator since it has a bible statement included in the description.

We wonder if people realize that “Satan” did not create anything, he was created, 

became jealous and rebelled against “God”. He was then tossed from the heavens to rule the city of Hades ergo “Fallen Angel”… As we have stated before Wendy, that page was not an April fool’s joke.

To continue where we were, more screen shots on the way, thanks to one of our team-mates to provide them.

Veterinarians do not resist Breed restrictions yet they do have a difference in opinions, about this issue. Yet Luke feels as though no one in that profession should have an opinion or a right to voice his or her opinion. Are we saying all Veterinarians are not swindlers or frauds? No, yet those types are few far and in-between. Comparing the Tobacco, Gun, and Hotel industry to Veterinarians is like saying a Drama Actor portraying a doctor can do real surgeries. Luke your statement is flawed.

Please explain how a DOG can hijack an idea or a reputation, it’s improbable, A dog cannot communicate like us, ergo has no voice to talk or make speeches pertaining to how one feels. We as humans are the ones who can HIJACK ideas or reputation and slap it on dogs. However, in this instance, nothing was hijacked. One more thing, you spelled organization wrong.

We also forgot to mention Luke; the ones who misidentify the pit bulls are those who cannot distinguish the differences, since MEDIA shows dog pictures that are of BULLDOGS and or a DOGO… So, who is actually making it worse for whom?
Funny we do not remembering slandering any Chihuahua, yet, if you have to get technical, you do realize those small cute dogs were bred to kill snakes and protect their families right, so since they were bred to protect and kill an animal, Should we ban them too? Because that is what you trolls are stating.

(Any Animal that has been bred to guard, or kill another animal, should be put to death) On the other hand, are we wrong about that Luke is that not what you trolls are trying to get across?

The most ANYONE has ever said that was pertaining to the Chihuahua is:
(“any dog can bite, including the small superiority complex dog like the Chihuahua”) and that is far from slandering. Do we condone those who compare other breeds? NO! 

We do not worship pit bulls Luke, we are merely trying to state the obvious truth, that it is people’s fault that these dogs are in hot water.

So on top of breed discrimination Luke is also a racist, typical friend of Dawn James who sports a swastika (Nazi).

No explanation needed.

Really now? We're protesting against the sterilization law? Funny I see signs that say END BSL, not sterilization laws. Colleen take your pills, you're hallucinating. For those who think BSL is just a sterilization tactic, is truly blind! It is more than sterilization it is Genocide, it is punishing responsible owners and ignoring the true problem...(Dog Fighters). It is ripping dogs from homes and putting them to death when there is a BAN established.

Is this who you truly want to follow? One who spreads lies, and propaganda, one who follows a biased blogger who writes for maultalk, or adds a picture with an opposite meaning? Truly the human race is doomed then.

Really Colleen Lynn now you're attacking a pit bull rescue? Tia doesn't and never will support BSL. We do believe we have covered this before. However Just in case here is recaps of what Villalobos official STATEMENT was.

Now On the other hand here is what Villa Had to say in their email:

Villalobos Rescue Center

Yesterday

IN REGARDS TO THE WESTWEGO PIT BULL ORDINANCE - This is in part, the email that we sent to Councilman Glenn Green. As you can plainly see, there is nothing here that says we support BSL. What so many are doing is twisting my words of "showing support" as in we were supportive of the fact that he removed the BAN ordinance and was willing to meet halfway with rules such as spay/neuter, etc. providing it applied to all dogs. Again, in part this is the email that was sent......

If this ordinance is specifically for the Pit Bull breed, then the "bad guys" will get rid of their dogs to avoid any fines, violations and trouble from the law. They will then move on to a different breed. Right now the next most popular breed is the Cane Corso Mastiff. We're seeing ALOT of them in the area now. They're quickly becoming the next breed of choice for these "bad guys". So what then? We will have to create a Mastiff Ordinance? Or a Rottweiler Ordinance? And the list goes on. So what I propose is you put forth what Los Angeles did. and that's create these rules for all dogs. Why single out one breed? Why not make it safe for all dog owners and their dogs and the neighbors, etc? There is no reason that ANY dog should have to live on a chain or remain un-altered to create more unwanted puppies. Why not make it so that these ordinances come into effect so that animal control and law enforcement and rescuers have some leverage against owners who treat their dogs horribly?

So I'm sure you're getting bombarded with all sorts of ideas but I want to assure you that we are a group of level headed people that are here to assist you with anything you need to help create a safe and happy environment for the people of Westwego and their dogs.

Respectfully,
Tia Maria Torres

So would you like to again tell us how Villa was supporting BSL, Colleen? Your Lies are catching up with you and your cult, and everyone can indeed see it now.

For those who have anymore Screen shots or "information" on this woman don't hesitate to share it, names will be kept anonymous unless you wish to be known.

Thank you for supporting us in everything we are doing. We will continue to try our best to bring you the truth and facts. <3 VFTB - TEAM <3

Why Compromises Are Needed

I think throughout all the years of fighting BSL, we forgot how to compromise and forgot how our dogs are really in danger. Some wish for no compromises yet forget how difficult it is to convince people in government seats.

As per say what happened in Westwego with Villa and Green, they came to a compromise and people have been twisting Villa's words. People really do not understand how debates, arguments and compromises work then, now do they?

Do people not understand, if there wasn't a compromise the BSL would have passed, All Pit bull owners would of had to give up their dog. How is that fair to them? Why would you not support Villa, a PIT BULL RESCUE. She doesn't support BSL, she had to do what she had to do. And Instead of blatantly taken sides instead of ASKING what was said in the meeting between Villa and Green, people automatically jumped on board the HATE wagon once again.

Villa has done more good than anyone could possibly imagine, I think it's time to take a step back and look at all the options and look at what she was really trying to do.

I'm not taken sides, I don't support BSL, but I do understand that these compromises will be difficult for many. Since many cannot afford "Insurance" and many Insurance companies refuse to cover Pit type dogs.

Yet take it into consideration, that there are other options when it comes to insurance, such as the 24PetWatch, who offers insurance to Pit Type Dog owners.http://www.24petwatch.com/

Truthfully all dog owners should have insurance for their dogs, in case of an accident.

Compromises are needed, if we want to win against BSL. And no making compromises doesn't mean defeat, doesn't mean that they will take a yard or inch against us Anti-BSL advocates, it means we are all going in the right direction.

As I have stated before, nothing has been set in motion yet. Nothing will be set in motion until everything has been voted upon. Do I think there should have been other options in this compromise, Yes, as do we all.

Will I stand behind people who protest against Villa, No I will not and neither will my team.

One must understand without compromises, dog owners automatically volunteer their dogs to the BSL. Dog owners who don't compromise are willing to see their dogs taken away, put in a shelter and straight to needle. Compromises are what get us to keep our DOGS, our FAMILY.

And if advocates and dog owners can't see between that grey line, then we are truly without hope of ever winning against BSL.

Now On the other hand here is what Villa Had to say:

Villalobos Rescue Center

Yesterday

IN REGARDS TO THE WESTWEGO PIT BULL ORDINANCE - This is in part, the email that we sent to Councilman Glenn Green. As you can plainly see, there is nothing here that says we support BSL. What so many are doing is twisting my words of "showing support" as in we were supportive of the fact that he removed the BAN ordinance and was willing to meet halfway with rules such as spay/neuter, etc. providing it applied to all dogs. Again, in part this is the email that was sent......

If this ordinance is specifically for the Pit Bull breed, then the "bad guys" will get rid of their dogs to avoid any fines, violations and trouble from the law. They will then move on to a different breed. Right now the next most popular breed is the Cane Corso Mastiff. We're seeing ALOT of them in the area now. They're quickly becoming the next breed of choice for these "bad guys". So what then? We will have to create a Mastiff Ordinance? Or a Rottweiler Ordinance? And the list goes on. So what I propose is you put forth what Los Angeles did. and that's create these rules for all dogs. Why single out one breed? Why not make it safe for all dog owners and their dogs and the neighbors, etc? There is no reason that ANY dog should have to live on a chain or remain un-altered to create more unwanted puppies. Why not make it so that these ordinances come into effect so that animal control and law enforcement and rescuers have some leverage against owners who treat their dogs horribly?

So I'm sure you're getting bombarded with all sorts of ideas but I want to assure you that we are a group of level headed people that are here to assist you with anything you need to help create a safe and happy environment for the people of Westwego and their dogs.

Respectfully,
Tia Maria Torres

Now where on earth does it say they support BSL? 

Getting Green to accept that there be an ALL DOG law is somehow supporting BSL? Getting your pets spayed and neutered is supporting BSL? Far as I knew it was a responsible thing to do to get your dog of any breed spayed and neutered if you were not a registered breeder. Far as I knew obtaining insurance for all dog breeds was also responsible dog ownership. Yet for some reason someone has to TWIST WORDS in order to make it look bad.

Keep thinking with this mentality and all dog owners will wind up without any pets,companions and family. I agree with these laws because it is not targeting a SPECIFIC breed, it is an "ALL DOG LAW" and it supports "RESPONSIBLE OWNERSHIP".

If people aren't for "Responsible Ownership", than what does that say for us as advocates? We're doomed to lose our pets.

Next time ASK before ATTACKING.