Showing posts with label Bully Breeds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bully Breeds. Show all posts

Saturday, June 22, 2013

It Just Doesn't Stop - Pit Haters Are illogical

My friend shares a petition on a page for the defense of Pit bulls, and this woman Marie casually comments like it doesn't mean anything. Marie, If you must know the only feelings hurt were yours and DBO's founder. Then again we all know truth hurts doesn't it?








































Where is she getting this information? You cannot tell a pitbull based on looks, a DNA test is required, or did you miss that memo? Furthermore you didn't answer our friends question about DBO...

So, I'll ask. If DBO supports human life, why does she stalk and attack people, along with affiliating herself with a known child killer and people like you?

Fair question, would love to see it answered. Pit's do not have a high prey drive sweety, unless you consider their origins of HERDING high prey drive, then again they don't kill live stock unless TRAINED wrong.


I believe we covered this before unpredictability are caused by the dog fighters who train and breed their dogs to be aggressive... It is the dog fighters fault that we have this problem. Do some research Marie.

15 out of 16? That's a bit off, fact is there were no PIT BULLS in the news, but then again since the Bull Mastiffs and cane corso's along with other breeds are under this label, it would be accurate. However, they are not pit bulls, APBTS weren't in the news this year unless it was a dog fighting raid bust that had rescued APBTS. Would you like to continue as my friend asked...




I surely didn't see you say they weren't bred for fighting, I saw you clearly state that Dogfighters - Pit fighters do this. Which is fact, yet you are correct Marie is missing the key points that you have stated.

This is what advocates deal with on a daily basis from these haters. The illogical spurting of falsified statements.

Marie I do believe you have a nickname don't you, Something along the lines of Mad-dog? I wonder why that is.

Like my friend stated, keep repeating you are doing a great impersonation of a PARROT. 


Friday, May 31, 2013

Funny Things - SDS

This is hilarious to say the least; apparently, we made threats to someone named Eve. Sorry, yet, we are not listening to you. Saying we have a special surprise is not a threat, far from it. Special surprise could mean a guest appearance, on your page, having a decent conversation with you. However since you did this little stunt, we changed our minds.

Eve Founder of Safe Dog Society (Safe Douche Society) and “Summers Eve” (Summers Shit) has delusions of grandeur.
Oh please, reporting us for making this statement does what now? Eve you are SDS, Why are you hiding behind this page now? What Threat? Did we hit a nerve by saying people will stop following you and your crank ideas?

Sorry we do not appreciate you, making threats to us. You have been banned from our page, yet, go ahead continue to make comments on your aliases, along with your little lackey’s they will all be banned because we heard your nonsense before.

You keep stating you say nothing wrong, yet you are targeting the Pit type dogs. In addition, stating that Pit advocates are defending criminals, dogfighters, etc. We do not defend them we defend the responsible owners. Get your facts straight you sociopath.


If you are not stating anything wrong, Explain what has been stated in these screen shots listed below. Thanks Nutty For supplying them on your page, Hope you don’t mind we kind of snagged them.




























Pit bull owners hurting Pit bulls? You have one thing right, yet you said it wrong. It should be along the lines of Irresponsible Pit Bull Owners are hurting Pit bulls. Does not mean ban or kill all pit bulls? Explain Denver you twat!





















http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2009/10/leaked_photos_of_dead_pit_bull.php
Look what your BSL HAS DONE! Over 3,000 dogs, Pulled from the shelter and or homes and killed in DENVER when the BAN was enacted. This photo was taken in 2006. Would you like to explain this? Would you like to explain how BSL DOESN'T KILL? We doubt you can, these dogs were innocent  these dogs did nothing wrong, but be born into a society that specifically targets these breeds because of what the MEDIA states.

We don't know what's more amazing Eve (SDS) your lies or those who follow you. Case In Point:






























No Alexandra, you cannot be an animal lover type person, and HATE a specific breed. Animals lovers, love all animals and speak for them. You are no such person, You aren't even someone who appreciates or loves dogs, Enough said about you. (Hypocrite)

Back to Safe Douche Society:


















Look to the right, she states; Advocates like us are protecting the dogfighters, the dog breeders, and sadistic animal abusers. We are not, and will not Protect them, If you have been listening and or should we say STALKING facebook you would have seen Advocates/activists such as the ANTI-DOGFIGHTING CAMPAIGN, working tirelessly against these people. Which By The Way, we do help them with this issue. However, Thanks for Screen shotting what was stated by us, and twisting it into something else.

Now onto this little bit of information:
























Who stated what now? The Truth is, Saint Bernards, and English Staffies were treated as Nanny dogs... However, they ARE NOT NANNY DOGS, and we have made it a point to STATE this every time we advocate. Vintage pictures that have been taken were showing kids and family appreciating and spending time with their dogs. The Nanny dog came from the Peter Pan Books, start reading, you'll get a kick out of it. Oh and STOP using the "Nanny Dog" excuse, you hypocrite.

Next Issue:






























Eve, AKA Summers Eve, aka Safe Douche Society, why are you having a swastika sporting Nazi commenting on your page? (Dawn James) So you keep track? We're being  Stalked? So does this mean we can REPORT YOU, FOR HARASSMENT and CYBERSTALKING  We think it does, thank you for admitting this Eve.

Yet We have to Agree with Dawn James on this, Facebook Is the problem. Their allowing you to keep talking, lying, harass, and belittle those who are doing the right thing by speaking up for these Bully Breeds.


Finally To answer your question of why we would be upset with you stating what you did, You lumped all pit owners together with that Creten ERIC GRAY, We are nothing like him, we take care of our dogs, we take them to the Vets, Get them spayed, neutered, boosters, etc etc. We don't leave them in a kennel in their own piss, and feces like this piece of filth has done.

It concerns us, because WE are the VOICES for the VOICELESS, do you understand yet? CAN YOU COMPREHEND anything?

Thursday, May 30, 2013

DogsBite.ORG- Part 2- enough said for now

DogsBite.Org- Part 2
The followers, or should we say cult have been told to harass pro pit advocate pages. Lately they have been targeting a page that represents NZ, American Pit Bull Terrier Assn INC. Screen Shots down below to prove how unstable and illiterate these little cult trolls really are. These are some of the Usual Suspects, which are in affiliation with Colleen Lynn. APBT Inc and Our Team have had some long heated debates with them, defending once again our breeds that have been slandered.
That certainly is not the latest research, as you can all plainly see those articles are from 2011 and 2012. On top of the fact it isn’t even studies, it is medical records and notes that MD’s have taken over a course of a year, documenting dog bite incidents, does it say pit bulls? Yes, do we think they know for sure it was a Pit bull? No, because it has been proven that there are those who cannot distinguish a pit bull from a white boxer, or Dogo Argentino or even a bulldog or even a terrier.


This is the original Article, this is also were Colleen Lynn spends most of her time supposedly “researching”.

http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/content/early/2012/06/29/injuryprev-2012-040389.full?
Apparently Lynne was blind to one detail this article stated such as this:
Past evaluations of different forms of regulations have led to conclusions that BSL is ineffective in reducing dog-bite injuries of varying severities
Shocking to see those whom support BSL say that it is flawed, oh my!

Did Lynne also forget to mention the TEXAS STUDY was a flawed one and has been thrown out, case in point:

(Dr. Bonnie Beaver, a professor of veterinary medicine at Texas A&M University and an expert in dog behavior, described the study as flawed. Beaver, a former president of the American Veterinary Medicine Association, who led a national task force on preventing dog bites, has testified against breed-specific bans before state lawmakers.
“These are serious injuries to humans, and I do not mean to belittle the seriousness of the problem seen at the hospital,” Beaver said. “However, the dog-related data is seriously flawed, and are used at will to try to prove a specific point of view.”
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Pit-bulls-reputation-takes-new-hit-1370739.php)
Raghavan, is a BSL enthusiast of course Raghavan would partially lie about studies that have been discontinued or thrown away, due to the flawed aspect.


Did not read the studies, yet quotes Raghavan. Interesting to say the least, the simple copying and pasting of statements without one ounce of legitimate proof supplied. Who is to say that these people actually obtained it from Ragahavan and not Colleen?
Banning any breed of dog would not help the issue, people would just move on to the next desirable breed, so where would this leave us? Genocide, wiping out every single dog in existence this is what BSL would be capable of, yet these people fail to realize this. This is why we fight; this is what keeps us going, to fight against BSL to prevent this Genocide from happening.

This is our reality, and until these people wake up, our fight will continue.



Who said we were ignoring the studies? Peer-reviewed, please Lynne read what you have said. PEER-REVIEWED, this is saying that these studies are nothing more than NOTES. Notes tend to have misinformation, and propaganda behind it, since those who are viewing it have the same narrow mindedness as the ones who wrote it. We are open to discussion and opinions yet if it is repetitive, we tend to turn off our attention to you. AWA was and has been honest behind their reasoning you are just failing to see the points behind it.

As APBT pointed out, the Spanish study showed nothing of what Lynne Stated. You didn’t have access Lynne? I think it was more along the lines, of not wanting the truth being stated.

Joanna claims she follows the bible by heart, we would like to know which one she follows, because spewing out hate toward a creation of the lord sure the heck is being hypocritical to us, we have actually taken the time to read the bibles out there. We may not worship the same superior being, but we do not turn a blind eye to most of the lessons. Joanna is also a supporter of one of the trolling pages such as this one:

We suspect that she might even be a co-creator since it has a bible statement included in the description.























We wonder if people realize that “Satan” did not create anything, he was created, 
became jealous and rebelled against “God”. He was then tossed from the heavens to rule the city of Hades ergo “Fallen Angel”… As we have stated before Wendy, that page was not an April fool’s joke.


To continue where we were, more screen shots on the way, thanks to one of our team-mates to provide them.


Veterinarians do not resist Breed restrictions yet they do have a difference in opinions, about this issue. Yet Luke feels as though no one in that profession should have an opinion or a right to voice his or her opinion. Are we saying all Veterinarians are not swindlers or frauds? No, yet those types are few far and in-between. Comparing the Tobacco, Gun, and Hotel industry to Veterinarians is like saying a Drama Actor portraying a doctor can do real surgeries. Luke your statement is flawed.

Please explain how a DOG can hijack an idea or a reputation, it’s improbable, A dog cannot communicate like us, ergo has no voice to talk or make speeches pertaining to how one feels. We as humans are the ones who can HIJACK ideas or reputation and slap it on dogs. However, in this instance, nothing was hijacked. One more thing, you spelled organization wrong.


We also forgot to mention Luke; the ones who misidentify the pit bulls are those who cannot distinguish the differences, since MEDIA shows dog pictures that are of BULLDOGS and or a DOGO… So, who is actually making it worse for whom?
Funny we do not remembering slandering any Chihuahua, yet, if you have to get technical, you do realize those small cute dogs were bred to kill snakes and protect their families right, so since they were bred to protect and kill an animal, Should we ban them too? Because that is what you trolls are stating.

(Any Animal that has been bred to guard, or kill another animal, should be put to death) On the other hand, are we wrong about that Luke is that not what you trolls are trying to get across?

The most ANYONE has ever said that was pertaining to the Chihuahua is:
(“any dog can bite, including the small superiority complex dog like the Chihuahua”) and that is far from slandering. Do we condone those who compare other breeds? NO! 

We do not worship pit bulls Luke, we are merely trying to state the obvious truth, that it is people’s fault that these dogs are in hot water.

So on top of breed discrimination Luke is also a racist, typical friend of Dawn James who sports a swastika (Nazi).







No explanation needed.


Really now? We're protesting against the sterilization law? Funny I see signs that say END BSL, not sterilization laws. Colleen take your pills, you're hallucinating. For those who think BSL is just a sterilization tactic, is truly blind! It is more than sterilization it is Genocide, it is punishing responsible owners and ignoring the true problem...(Dog Fighters). It is ripping dogs from homes and putting them to death when there is a BAN established.

Is this who you truly want to follow? One who spreads lies, and propaganda, one who follows a biased blogger who writes for maultalk, or adds a picture with an opposite meaning? Truly the human race is doomed then.



Really Colleen Lynn now you're attacking a pit bull rescue? Tia doesn't and never will support BSL. We do believe we have covered this before. However Just in case here is recaps of what Villalobos official STATEMENT was.




Now On the other hand here is what Villa Had to say in their email:
IN REGARDS TO THE WESTWEGO PIT BULL ORDINANCE - This is in part, the email that we sent to Councilman Glenn Green. As you can plainly see, there is nothing here that says we support BSL. What so many are doing is twisting my words of "showing support" as in we were supportive of the fact that he removed the BAN ordinance and was willing to meet halfway with rules such as spay/neuter, etc. providing it applied to all dogs. Again, in part this is the email that was sent......

If this ordinance is specifically for the Pit Bull breed, then the "bad guys" will get rid of their dogs to avoid any fines, violations and trouble from the law. They will then move on to a different breed. Right now the next most popular breed is the Cane Corso Mastiff. We're seeing ALOT of them in the area now. They're quickly becoming the next breed of choice for these "bad guys". So what then? We will have to create a Mastiff Ordinance? Or a Rottweiler Ordinance? And the list goes on. So what I propose is you put forth what Los Angeles did. and that's create these rules for all dogs. Why single out one breed? Why not make it safe for all dog owners and their dogs and the neighbors, etc? There is no reason that ANY dog should have to live on a chain or remain un-altered to create more unwanted puppies. Why not make it so that these ordinances come into effect so that animal control and law enforcement and rescuers have some leverage against owners who treat their dogs horribly?

So I'm sure you're getting bombarded with all sorts of ideas but I want to assure you that we are a group of level headed people that are here to assist you with anything you need to help create a safe and happy environment for the people of Westwego and their dogs.

Respectfully,
Tia Maria Torres
So would you like to again tell us how Villa was supporting BSL, Colleen? Your Lies are catching up with you and your cult, and everyone can indeed see it now.

For those who have anymore Screen shots or "information" on this woman don't hesitate to share it, names will be kept anonymous unless you wish to be known.

Thank you for supporting us in everything we are doing. We will continue to try our best to bring you the truth and facts. <3 VFTB - TEAM <3

Saturday, May 25, 2013

Why Compromises Are Needed

I think throughout all the years of fighting BSL, we forgot how to compromise and forgot how our dogs are really in danger. Some wish for no compromises yet forget how difficult it is to convince people in government seats.

As per say what happened in Westwego with Villa and Green, they came to a compromise and people have been twisting Villa's words. People really do not understand how debates, arguments and compromises work then, now do they?

Do people not understand, if there wasn't a compromise the BSL would have passed, All Pit bull owners would of had to give up their dog. How is that fair to them? Why would you not support Villa, a PIT BULL RESCUE. She doesn't support BSL, she had to do what she had to do. And Instead of blatantly taken sides instead of ASKING what was said in the meeting between Villa and Green, people automatically jumped on board the HATE wagon once again.

Villa has done more good than anyone could possibly imagine, I think it's time to take a step back and look at all the options and look at what she was really trying to do.

I'm not taken sides, I don't support BSL, but I do understand that these compromises will be difficult for many. Since many cannot afford "Insurance" and many Insurance companies refuse to cover Pit type dogs.

Yet take it into consideration, that there are other options when it comes to insurance, such as the 24PetWatch, who offers insurance to Pit Type Dog owners.http://www.24petwatch.com/

Truthfully all dog owners should have insurance for their dogs, in case of an accident.

Compromises are needed, if we want to win against BSL. And no making compromises doesn't mean defeat, doesn't mean that they will take a yard or inch against us Anti-BSL advocates, it means we are all going in the right direction.

As I have stated before, nothing has been set in motion yet. Nothing will be set in motion until everything has been voted upon. Do I think there should have been other options in this compromise, Yes, as do we all.

Will I stand behind people who protest against Villa, No I will not and neither will my team.

One must understand without compromises, dog owners automatically volunteer their dogs to the BSL. Dog owners who don't compromise are willing to see their dogs taken away, put in a shelter and straight to needle. Compromises are what get us to keep our DOGS, our FAMILY.

And if advocates and dog owners can't see between that grey line, then we are truly without hope of ever winning against BSL.


Now On the other hand here is what Villa Had to say:
IN REGARDS TO THE WESTWEGO PIT BULL ORDINANCE - This is in part, the email that we sent to Councilman Glenn Green. As you can plainly see, there is nothing here that says we support BSL. What so many are doing is twisting my words of "showing support" as in we were supportive of the fact that he removed the BAN ordinance and was willing to meet halfway with rules such as spay/neuter, etc. providing it applied to all dogs. Again, in part this is the email that was sent......

If this ordinance is specifically for the Pit Bull breed, then the "bad guys" will get rid of their dogs to avoid any fines, violations and trouble from the law. They will then move on to a different breed. Right now the next most popular breed is the Cane Corso Mastiff. We're seeing ALOT of them in the area now. They're quickly becoming the next breed of choice for these "bad guys". So what then? We will have to create a Mastiff Ordinance? Or a Rottweiler Ordinance? And the list goes on. So what I propose is you put forth what Los Angeles did. and that's create these rules for all dogs. Why single out one breed? Why not make it safe for all dog owners and their dogs and the neighbors, etc? There is no reason that ANY dog should have to live on a chain or remain un-altered to create more unwanted puppies. Why not make it so that these ordinances come into effect so that animal control and law enforcement and rescuers have some leverage against owners who treat their dogs horribly?

So I'm sure you're getting bombarded with all sorts of ideas but I want to assure you that we are a group of level headed people that are here to assist you with anything you need to help create a safe and happy environment for the people of Westwego and their dogs.

Respectfully,
Tia Maria Torres


Now where on earth does it say they support BSL? 

Getting Green to accept that there be an ALL DOG law is somehow supporting BSL? Getting your pets spayed and neutered is supporting BSL? Far as I knew it was a responsible thing to do to get your dog of any breed spayed and neutered if you were not a registered breeder. Far as I knew obtaining insurance for all dog breeds was also responsible dog ownership. Yet for some reason someone has to TWIST WORDS in order to make it look bad.

Keep thinking with this mentality and all dog owners will wind up without any pets,companions and family. I agree with these laws because it is not targeting a SPECIFIC breed, it is an "ALL DOG LAW" and it supports "RESPONSIBLE OWNERSHIP".

If people aren't for "Responsible Ownership", than what does that say for us as advocates? We're doomed to lose our pets.

Next time ASK before ATTACKING.

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Dog Fighting Is An Epidemic

Dog Fighting- A Billion Dollar Underground Industry in the USA and Some Part of the UK.

In all parts of the USA Dog fighting is illegal, In some parts over seas Dog fighting is not. Dog fighting has become an epidemic. Dog Fighting creates Danger not only for the dogs, but for people. Dog Fighters have become breeders, which has been leading to selective breeding and the sales of puppies, which some wind up at shelters. Due to this problem as My team and I have explained before, these puppies become aggressive at a later age, and not all of these dogs are Pit bull types.

We must have an understanding here, that it is not okay to fight ANY dog breeds for any reason, not even for money or fame. Putting dogs up against one another is wrong, these dogs never chose to do it, they don't like fighting as some have stated. These dogs would rather be by our side, taking walks, playing fetch or going camping with us.

These dogs would rather help us with our everyday needs, such as being our seeing eye dogs, farm hands, or helping those who cannot move their limbs. They would rather be police dogs, or therapeutic dogs.

It is my understanding that recently there has been a dog fighting bust in Montgomery TX, Humble TX, Philadelphia Pa, Germantown Pa and many other areas...

This issue has been made illegal for a reason, and apparently these people can't get it into their heads that this is ANIMAL CRUELTY. Forcing dogs to fight to the death, is not how you treat your beloved animal companion.

This EPIDEMIC, has become more and more abundant with this passing year, and it must come to a stop.

Facebook and Craigslist has been a dog fighters paradise to advertise their fighting dogs and or puppies and or were an event will be held. People have not been reporting this to authorities, instead they report it to Craigs and Facebook which in turn DOES NOTHING.

Report it to Authorities, make them look into this issue that has been getting out of hand, These people must be locked up to prevent this outrageous abuse of these dogs. If the authorities don't listen to you than REPORT it to those WHO WILL. That being Us and our friends at the Anti Dog Fighting Campaign.

If you see a possible dog fighting site or abuse of any kind, report it to us or to the anti dog fighting campaign team members. Our contact information is listed on this blog, under the investigate and reporting.



Reporting To Us:
Voicesforthebreeds@aim.com
theavocateroftruth@gmail.com
HarleyLatimere@gmail.com
anti-dogfightingcampaign@hotmail.com 


What you should send in the messages:
Links, Names, Pictures of evidence, Addresses of the criminals etc. Anything that will help put these people behind bars.

Thursday, April 25, 2013

BSL and You


Breed specific legislation and you:
Speaking out against BSL

15 years of advocating, against those who would cause harm to our beloved animals, is not easy. Majority of the time it is very difficult to keep our calm while peacefully protesting against certain areas that cause issues, for our animal’s safety. Now, advocates like me are fighting against breed specific legislation (BSL).
People question why we want to fight against the BSL, and what they stand for. It is because of this fact, that this law is not safe for any breed of dog. How many people reading this right now, think it will not or cannot affect their dog?

My estimate would be 4 out of 10 people think this, from my experiences with emails, comments, and posts on blogs. Those who think that BSL is okay, stick with statements that the BSL only wishes for the owners to spay and neuter their dogs. Obviously if that were true, I would not be writing this article right now would I. The truth is, I agree with spay and neutering the dogs if it does not cause an extinction of the dog breeds. What I do not agree with is the annihilation of the existence of these breeds that BSL is targeting.
Common sense would be helpful right now at this point for some people, to take note if everyone spayed and neutered their dog in the entire world all dogs would cease to exist. So here is my point, legit breeders are an unavoidable evil for procreating our dog breeds. I do not agree with backyard breeders, puppy mills, or those who breed any dog for fighting purposes.

Why does BSL exist? No one really knows why, yet there have been statements about this issue since the 1970’s, which they started due to a population boom of a breed that was in high demand due to the media, I.e. Movies, TV shows. Those breeds being the Doberman Pinchers, these breeds were considered guard dogs or grippers. Truthfully, BSL could have been in effect as early as the mid 1980s, as one law site would suggest that. 

Reference: (http://www.animallaw.info/articles/aruslweiss2001.htm)
History of Breed-Specific Legislation
“Breed-Specific Legislation (BSL) is, in simple terms, a statute or regulation that is directed toward one or more specific breeds of dogs.  The majority of BSL is focused on breeds traditionally known as "dangerous," or those that have demonstrated particular propensities for aggression and violent behavior.  In the early 1980s, a number of fatalities and serious injuries caused by certain breeds, including pit bull dogs, brought to the public's attention a perceived need for more stringent laws governing restraint of dogs.1  In 1980, for example, Hollywood, Florida's City Commission passed an ordinance that required persons who owned pit bull dogs to "complete special registration forms and prove the possession of $25,000 of public liability insurance."2  The regulation applied to several breeds, collectively identified as pit bulls.  In 1984, a New Mexico town completely banned pit bulls and allowed county officers to confiscate and euthanize the dogs.3  Also that year, Cincinnati, Ohio enacted a regulation that "defined vicious dogs to include all pit bull terriers," and put special restrictions on the confinement, sale, and control of those dogs which were not applicable to other breeds.4  In each of these situations, one breed of dog has been singled out as "inherently dangerous to society," regardless of the individual dogs' present or past behavior.”

BSL is not okay and it never will be, BSL condemns dogs to death based on the breed, looks and flawed bite statistics. How many breeds do you think is on the BSL list, One, Two maybe four? Try more; try 75 dog breeds on this murder list. 75 is a very scary number isn’t it?

Here is the List: Reference- (http://www.dogguide.net/blog/2008/07/bsl-shocker-a-list-of-75-dogs-that-are-banned-or-restricted/)
1. AIREDALE TERRIER
2. AKBASH
3. AKITA
4. ALAPAHA BLUE BLOOD BULLDOG
5. ALASKAN MALAMUTE
6. ALSATIAN SHEPHERD
7. AMERICAN BULLDOG
8. AMERICAN HUSKY
9. AMERICAN PIT BULL TERRIER
10. AMERICAN STAFFORDSHIRE TERRIER
11. AMERICAN WOLFDOG
12. ANATOLIAN SHEPHERD
13. ARIKARA DOG
14. AUSTRALIAN CATTLE DOG
15. AUSTRALIAN SHEPHERD
16. BELGIAN MALINOIS
17. BELGIAN SHEEPDOG
18. BELGIAN TURVUREN
19. BLUE HEELER
20. BOERBOL
21. BORZOI
22. BOSTON TERRIER
23. BOUVIER DES FLANDRES
24. BOXER
25. BULLDOG
26. BULL TERRIER
27. BULL MASTIFF
28. CANE CORSO
29. CATAHOULA LEOPARD DOG
30. CAUCASIAN SHEPHERD
31. CHINESE SHAR PEI
32. CHOW-CHOW
33. COLORADO DOG
34. DOBERMAN PINSCHER
35. DOGO DE ARGENTINO
36. DOGUE DE BORDEAUX
37. ENGLISH MASTIFFS
38. ENGLISH SPRINGER SPANIEL
39. ESKIMO DOG
40. ESTRELA MOUNTAIN DOG
41. FILA BRASILIERO
42. FOX TERRIER
43. FRENCH BULLDOG
44. GERMAN SHEPHERD DOG
45. GOLDEN RETRIEVER
46. GREENLAND HUSKY
47. GREAT DANE
48. GREAT PYRANEES
49. ITALIAN MASTIFF
50. KANGAL DOG
51. KEESHOND
52. KOMONDOR
53. KOTEZEBUE HUSKY
54. KUVAZ
55. LABRADOR RETRIEVER
56. LEONBERGER
57. MASTIFF
58. NEOPOLITAN MASTIFF
59. NEWFOUNDLAND
60. OTTERHOUND
61. PRESA DE CANARIO
62. PRESA DE MALLORQUIN
63. PUG
64. ROTTWEILER
65. SAARLOOS WOLFHOND
66. SAINT BERNARD
67. SAMOYED
68. SCOTTISH DEERHOUND
69. SIBERIAN HUSKY
70. SPANISH MASTIFF
71. STAFFORDSHIRE BULL TERRIER
72. TIMBER SHEPHERD
73. TOSA INU
74. TUNDRA SHEPHERD
75. WOLF SPITZ

This list will continue to grow with each passing year, or with media coverage of dog attacks. No one seems to ask the right questions anymore about BSL, and their methods of this witch-hunt. Why do these people, have the right to tell us what breed we can own or have? Why must they base every single dog breed on bite statistics, looks and or for what other dog owners have done? 
Not all dogs are vicious or dangerous or trained to attack or fight or to guard. BSL uses blank statements such as Pit Bull Dogs are inherently dangerous, and people follow this statement, without ever having the great privilege of owning this breed.

First breed that was on the BSL target list was the Chow’s, in the 1960s, even though BSL wasn’t well known back then, followed by the Dobermans 1970s, the Rottweiler’s 1980s, and in this time period BSL became well known, and now they have the Pit bulls as their target. These dogs are being scrutinized for what a handful of irresponsible owners have trained and bred their dog to do. 
What BSL does not tell you, is that there is an epidemic of Game Dogs. Game Dogs are bred for the aggressiveness; these dogs would be the inherently dangerous ones, which the BSL are talking about. Yet BSL would have you believe that any dog can be inherently dangerous, that no dog will show signs of aggression. Dogs, of any breed show signs of aggression, unless they are the game dogs.
Game dogs the ones that are used for fighting, are the ones that show no aggression until the last second. Game dogs that are used for fighting are the ones that snap without warning, Game dogs the ones used for fighting have no choice, innocent house pets or strays are used for baiting, this should be common knowledge, yet it is not. 

How do I know this? Because of the experiences and trouble with an ex-friend of mine who was into this cruelty of dog fighting. He explained the differences in house pets, and game dogs to me. I later turned him in, due to his cruel activities in the dog-fighting world.

Why do you think game dog and house pet differences are not common knowledge? 

Because, BSL and the Anti Pit Bull advocates would have you believe that the non-game dogs are the inherently dangerous dog. What am I trying to say here? If you want the truth, it is better to do the research yourself, then to listen to those who wish for our breeds to be destroyed.

However, there are different types of usage for the word “game dogs”.
Hunting
Athletic competition
Not all game dogs are bad, just as not all breeds of dogs are bad, it depends on the owner and the way these dogs have been trained or what they have been bred for.

A couple of sites I recommend:
https://www.facebook.com/StupidThingsPitBullHatersSay
http://www.ehow.com/info_10009014_game-pitbull.html

So please say no to BSL, and this endless witch-hunt. Tell them to do the actual detective work and bring in the cruel dog fighters instead of blaming everyone for what these irresponsible people are doing.